Thursday, July 19, 2007

The Marginal Pain Equation and Credit Cards

Again, superb find from the Social Customer Manifesto. Research is showing that customers weight up how much they want/desire/will derive pleasure from a purchase right now, and the pain it will cause them right now when it comes to handing over the money.
Loewenstein hopes to follow up his research regarding the "pain of paying" by exploring a growing and looming problem in the United States–why so many people run up so much credit card debt. Much like he did in the study with Knutson and Prelec, he wants to see what goes on in the brain when someone pulls out plastic instead of money when making purchases. His hypothesis is that credit cards numb the brain's pain center (i.e., reduce activity in the insular cortex) because no currency is exchanged and costs are postponed, thus weakening the body's built-in defence mechanism against unnecessary purchases. He believes that MRI testing could provide definitive answers."
It certainly is an interesting perspective on the traditional models of trying to understand the decision making process. Given that other books are saying that emotional connection plays a much larger part in any buying/voting decision than rational evaluations, it certainly plays into the idea that offering customers all the emotional support you can to overcome this "pain point" is important. Perhaps studies will show that talking to a customer service representative provides this, even through click-to-talk solutions.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Buzz Differential

The internet, and more recently, the "blogsphere" is supposed to be a great way of generating "buzz" about your product or service. I've never really bought into that line of thought. Personalities aside, not many companies are, or should be, willing to build their brand on the mugshot of their Head of Marketing. It might be more useful to think of the Blogs, feeds, and websites as a good way of building potential or opportunity for conversation. After all, the battle is for the customers attention, to attract feedback, and to be more agile than your competitors. Even the internet search engines are moving towards rankings based on "degree of conversation". In this respect, understanding which particular event signal the potential requirement for an interaction, is probably a good place to start from. Large enterprises with professionalised marketing follow such "event triggers". If you are looking for a mortgage you are probably also in the market for white goods (kitchen refits). If you are a company that is announcing a merger, you are probably soon in the market for an IT integration service. Nielson BuzzMetrics has released a report that I am sure will become a kind of bible for evaluating the use of "buzz marketing". It helps if your product or service is used "frequently" by the intended audience (i.e. daily if not weekly). But the report is still surprisingly shallow in its approach. What I took from this report is that companies need to build real product differentiation, support that with intelligent, if not outstanding communications strategies, and realise that "Internet Buzz" will not make an OK product sell any better. But we all knew that, didn't we. Gaining, or creating the opportunity for understanding your customers "event triggers" is probably a better starting point for building interaction potential, and thus overall "buzz" around your product or service.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Monday, July 16, 2007

Credit Cards and Culture

TheWiserMarketer.com reports on a CityBank Study on Credit Card Payments and Usage. Intrestingly, the real point here was that their are actual cultural differences in how people want to use their card, and what rewards they want to receive from them.
Culture's influence Citibank's report highlights the role culture plays when it comes to choosing a credit card. In some countries the appearance of a card is key and represents status, but in others discounts and rebates are the main attraction. In Australia the interest rate is the number one feature, in South Korea it's low fees and in Malaysia and China it's security features and fraud prevention that tops the list. The loyalty reward Cash rebates were the preferred type of reward in relation to loyalty and reward programmes with a 57% response. Second was discounts on products and services at 12%. Numerous questions were asked in relation to the future of credit cards. When asked if credit cards could double as a form of personal ID, India and China were most in favour, with "strongly agree" responses of 47% and 43% respectively. Australians and Malaysians were most opposed with 33% and 43% respectively saying they 'strongly disagreed'. The option of using a credit card to pay taxes was met with most enthusiasm in South Korea and China where 53% and 41% respectively said they strongly agreed. However, 38% of Australians said they strongly disagreed with the idea
It certainly opens out the potential to create niche cultural services based on the implicit value of the Credit Card as an ID Validation Mechanism. Of course the same thing could be said of PayPal and Google if they went that extra step to offer you a Payments Card valid at any store that used/integrated Google Checkout into their online/offline presence. Now what if, when you walked into a store, and Google Checkout/Analytics knew that "this store" had a "special offer on Nike", and you, the customer, had recently been browsing for new sneakers, would it not make sense to push an offer to you AND enable you to pay for it right there with Google Points?

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Liquid Services (and I don't mind drinking)

Blognation report the link up between ParkatmyHouse and Nestoria. A terrific example of where two services can combine for mutual benefit. I love these services because they also create market liquidity where there was none before: did you know you could make money by renting the space outside your door? I am sure this model is applicable to a whole range of services such as Holiday Home exchanges. By adding a few tweaks to the service moving forward you may even be able to receive offers on your car space only when it goes over a certain value, or track the open market value of car spaces so that you can price that into the sale of your home. Now that practically everyone carries a mobile phone its pretty easy to see how alert services are useful in this example. I wonder how much "a space" in a good local school would cost :)

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Friday, July 06, 2007

Do You Have A Phone Number On Your Site?

So, do you have a phone number on your site? with opening hours? and the ability to take orders there and then? Why not use a simple Click-To-Talk service like VoiceSage where you can specify all these elements, never miss a call, and take the friction out of your purchasing process. Its a simple thing to do. Hat Tip: Kelsey Group.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Stupid Scam That Misses Real Opportunity

Kelsey Group Blog reports on an absolute scam, and its more the pity, because there was an actually useful business service that could have been delivered. Apparently, Merchant circle were autodialling small businesses, telling them that there was an unfavorable review posted on them on the internet, and by going to the Merchant Circle address, and putting in their phone number, they would be able to see it. Of course, there was no review. Now talk about missing an opportunity. Besides the fact that it is easy enough to set up a Google alert on your company name, and have an sms sent to you, there is a fairly good service capable of being delivered if you offered to phone people and tell them there is a bad review of them somewhere. How hard would it be to create a service that called you when their was actually something negative written about your company, and would give you the opportunity to reply there and then? Not hard. Not hard at all. If this kind of thinking interests you drop me an email, and I'll tell you something.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Why do people drop out of online shopping?

Marketing Sherpa reports why: Many e-commerce checkouts are suffering from design problems which can be easily rectified. These include hidden charges, lack of clear delivery details, or poor usability. Business processes within the checkout area give customers problems User registration, shipping costs that customers consider too high, or overlong checkout processes. Some carts are abandoned for reasons beyond the control of the retailer. Some people will add items to their basket and reach the checkout when comparison shopping, with no intention of buying. Overall, some 60% of us abandon the process. Ultimately, you have to think that we are making the customer jump through hoops just to figure out if we are giving them value or not. At VoiceSage we made a decision early on: log on, use it, hear your phone ring, go wow! all functionality is clearly there, hopefully, easy to use. We can always make it better and if anyone has any comments on how we can improve this process, please let us know. Chances are, we can turn it around really fast.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Saturday, June 30, 2007

Oh, Just Wow!

In the midst (mist?) of iPhone coverage, one piece on VentureBeati caught my attention. CellSwapper allows people to trade what's left of their phone contract. People can use it to get out of their old plan and jump into a 2 year exclusive voice contract (yikes). The implications of this are really quite significant. Take services such as USwitch that enable you to compare service prices, and then switch. Well, if you have a contract with about two months to go, but a great introductory offer comes up elsewhere, your barriers to exiting the relationship have just been removed. I am sure their are legal and regulatory issues in they way of such free-flowing contractual commitments, but the market will find a way. The concept is excellent and reminds me why I read Sean over at The Park Paradigm, Sean loves markets. Read him to see how you can insure your business against the effects of the weather! For me, Cellswapper just reinforces the mantra that value delivery is a continuous process, and that free market forces will have their way.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Lose A Credit Card Customer For $12?

The Social Customer Manifesto reports on a customer scenario where a credit card company levied a late payment against a good customer who had paid their bill a day late due to various circumstances involving a holiday weekend, and the length of time it takes a payment to move through the banking system. Bottom line was that the customer trust and the customer relationship is now broken. For $12. I wonder if companies should call the customer and offer to wipe this late payment fee if the customer will accept a conversation with a customer service representative to investigate how they can better manage this relationship? If I am right, customers that are willing to speak to the customer service people are probably not long term credit risks. Customers that don't accept the invitation to conversation, are even worse credit risks than your system is currently telling you. Just a thought, given the lifetime value of a credit card customer.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Where Do You Go To Research Your IT Decision?

It seems inevitable that Purchasing managers will look more and more to user generated content to get an idea of what the IT they buying is really likely to have in store for them (MarketingVox). Overall, vendor websites, followed by user-generated content and editorial websites and trade magazines, are the most referenced information sources for IT purchasing information. - Vendor websites are referenced often or very often by 61.5 percent of respondents. - User-generated content is referenced often or very often by 42.6 percent of respondents. - Editorial websites and trade magazines are referenced often or very often by 40.7 percent of respondents. - Paid analyst research, catalogs and buyer's guides are referenced often or very often by 24.75 percent of respondents. It would seem to me that there is a key challenge here of making your website connect better to user group communities including the overall blogsphere. For hosted services this is even more imperative. No doubt this will open up into a key market for companies like VoiceSage that can provide click-to-talk and interaction technologies.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Monday, June 18, 2007

Mortgage Payment Defaulting

The Irish Independent reports that late payments and bad debt rates are rising in the sub prime mortgage lending sector in the US. The Mortgage Bankers' Association, in its quarterly snapshot of the mortgage market released yesterday, reported that the percentage of payments that were 30 or more days past due for "sub-prime" adjustable-rate home mortgages jumped to 15.75pc in the January-to-March quarter. The percentage of sub-prime adjustable-rate mortgages that started the foreclosure process in the first quarter of this year climbed to 3.23pc.That was up from 2.70pc in the final quarter of 2006 and was the highest on record. The first quarter's increase in foreclosures was mostly driven by problems in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona, said Duncan. Wow. I'm guessing (sic) that some of those people that are 30 days late, are about 25% likely to default on their mortgage. Wow. Many of the people that are caught in this trap were mis-sold from the get go. They were given the go ahead to buy properties they could never afford and teaser introductory rates. Given that the Irish paper also reports a doubling in the number of 100% Mortgages in the UK in an effort to bring first time buyers into the net, the underlying issue of affordability of the stock comes to the fore. Should you sell these products if the customer can't afford them? Who is doing the sanity & credit check here? This is a systems problem: sales executives were incentivised to sell to anybody. They were bad sales, and the companies were addicted to "bad profits". Poor credit management had its roots in poor sales processes, and bad marketing. Lenders are going to have to evolve the relationship with the at-risk-customer, re-invent the offer, and help them get to financial stability. If they do not, then the prices of the property will fall, speculators will have stood back as rental incomes fell in tandom, and the lender will be forced to sell the property for less than it was bought for. Some would say cut and cauterize. Why not get in front of the at-risk customer, and make an offer to pro-actively manage the problem, before the customer is labelled a defaulter, and the bank has bad debt on its books. Given that some people can now trade their good credit rating, (see Virtual Economics) why can't family and friends share their good credit rating to help out the one member of their Tribe that is trouble. Even getting a dig out on payments for the period that it takes to sell the house without before the sales process is "distressed", would deliver value. Sounds like an opportunity to me.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Referrals: Now 50% More Powerful !

Over the last number of posts, I have referred to the importance of customer reviews, and customer review sites (i.e. Bazzarvoice, Loudervoice,) They form an important part of the customers online search and evaluation strategy. Bazaarvoice claims that sales of a product go up from 16% to doubling just by adding customer reviews. The next stages are probably feature and price comparison and evaluation and customers are using tools for this as well, like Farecast. Going back to my old Marketing days, I'd say there is a great deal of brand-Halo effect going on, where we think we are getting good value, because the brand says so. With so much information, tools, and engines available, how on earth are we going to make decisions? It would seem to me that the overall Brand Reputation of a company will be paramount here, and Reputation will be driven by customer experience, the reporting of customer experience, and overall levels of customer advocacy. Customer advocacy is the result of customers getting exceptional service. 121media.com has a nice little piece on a US brokerage firm that uses direct personal contact to drive this sense of exceptional service. They don't have an IVR, or a cenralised customer service center. Calls are driven right through to the local branch where they are handled by trained and informed individuals. Now I am sure their are lots of infrastructure bells and whistles in the background to ensure that questions can be answered and clients serviced properly, but they key to the companies success is "driving contact", not "withdrawing from contact". So why do they want to draw the customers in?
financial services customers who make referrals tend to be worth 50 percent more than a typical customer, and a new referred customer is worth almost as twice much as a customer coming from other channels. Also, "advocates become more valuable and more loyal simply by making a referral, because they put their reputation on the line,"
Now back to some very old chestnuts: - how many of your customers would actively refer you to a friend? - do you know what interaction points provide the opportunity for exceptional customer service? - do you know how to identify, interact with, and leverage the power of advocacy? The Guys at BazaarVoice have a good entry on getting to grips with some of this stuff.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Monday, June 11, 2007

Dell To Storm Ahead?

It would seem that Dell are going to bring their mass customisation expertise a step forward. What am I talking about? Their ideastorm customer interaction space has thrown up two very "new to the company" ideas (1) open source operating system Ubuntu, and (2) environmentally friendly computers. Wait for this though: 100,000 people contributed to their Q&A on these decisions. Best quote for me in the article has to be Bob Pearson, VP-corporate group communications at Dell: "There's a big difference between pushing your story out vs. becoming relevant in customers' conversations." There is a lot in that quote. How do you create interaction opportunities that are relevant to your customer? Finally, if Dell could let people design how they wanted their MP3 player to interact with their Dell, they could launch a decent online alternative to iTunes. Crazy? Original Story on Advertising Age.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Data Will Present Itself - What Would Your Heat Map Look Like?

Well, I have to say, I saw this one coming. Having seen a sickness tracking mashup, to track how colds, flues and other illness are geographically dispersed, I thought that it was only a matter of time before people started adding crime related statistics onto real estate maps. These guys could get a double impact by tying into a Trulia API. Then you could track the effect of crime rate on house and commercial property prices. These kinds of statistics will become presented as easy to read Heat Maps. What's this got to do with customer service, and marketing? It has to do with information asymmetry, and the roles that people play in a service exchange. Can you imagine if your car owners network began posting data about parts failures? But this is far from being bad news for the enterprise. How many times have you spoken with someone about a restaurant they were at only to have them tell you "oh, actually, it wasn't that great, I felt kinda ripped off because the meat wasn't good", and when you ask them what did the restaurant do when you told them, they say "Oh, I didn't tell them, I just didn't tip that well!". Surfacing the customer issues and dealing with them well is what this new data availability will enable you to do. Imagine if your marketing person left a message on this car parts network with all the name and number of their local dealer, telling them that they are within warranty etc., or better still, with a click to call option that lets that network contributer contact the marketing person to resolve this issue to everyones benefit? If all the data you currently hold in your customer care system was available on the web how would that change the way you think about what the purpose of your customer service?

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Thursday, June 07, 2007

No, You actually do have to care about customer service transparency....

Damien Mulley, a popular Irish blogger, had a bad customer service experience. It's the usual thing, somebody didn't treat his concerns with respect, and now he is angry, and evangelical. He blogged the entirety of his experience, the outcomes, and how he felt about the whole thing. Then he set up his own moaning site for customer service failures www.iwillnothold.com For any (remaining)company out there that does not get this, this is not just some "crazy guy" setting up a website. He has readers, collaborators, family, friends. Now they will share the experience, gripe about their own experiences, and probably cause some significant brand damage. Now imagine that Damien was on line right now with a customer service team and "broadcasting the experience" to his network, LIVE! It is not farfetched. Customer service is not a set of metrics, it is an experience at each individuals level. When Paul Greenberg gets bad service, he posts up the entire interaction process online. Tom Raftery does this to a gut wrenching extent, but has become a reliable recorder of experience as a result. When performing an online check of companies and their reputation for service, all your Adwords will not negate the effect of a well written, and highly evidenced customer experience. Just to prove it, I googled the search term customer review sites and restricted the results to Ireland. The Result Damien Mulley » Blog Archive » An Irish Customer Care Portal? Wow Its like a circular argument, isn't it?

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Loyalty Schemes and Mobile Phones

The Wise Marketer has a piece this month on the integration of the mobile phone and loyalty programmes. Quite simply your phone is always with you and your loyalty card isn't. I find it baffling that companies don't think about using the mobile phone as a method of sending out personal invitations to events, redeemable coupons, and related money back offers. The quoted report from the Impaq Group: there are four key mechanics of a loyalty programme, all of which are well suited to the mobile phones that are already in the hands of more than 80% of consumers: - earning points - tracking points - spending points and - receiving information Clearly, loyalty programmes need to differentiate more. So there is a growing need to differentiate loyalty programmes - to build both engagement and participation - with the main areas of concern being: - Clear rules - An acceptable currency - Simple redemption - Relevant/valuable rewards - Achievable results - Flexibility And mobile phones may hold the key "Could the mobile phone actually replace the traditional plastic loyalty card? In practical terms it would be a relatively simple matter for almost any modern handset to display the customer's ID bar code (or other machine readable image) on-screen, either as wallpaper or as a saved image or MMS message. Even in more manual systems, the mobile phone number itself can be used as a unique identifier (although this has some potential problems in countries where prepaid cards are the norm). The consumer then only needs to show their phone (or quote their phone number) at the check-out. And it certainly would encourage interactivity, leading to additional engagement in the programme. And they could be reminded by SMS before Happy Hour promotions and other loyalty programme-related events. They can have their points balance available at all times, encouraging them to redeem more regularly. Already, mobile promotions from brands such as Heineken have shown that mobile voucher redemption is dramatically different to paper-based promotions: Heineken achieved a redemption rate of over 80% in one campaign". At VoiceSage have delivered quite simple campaigns for loyalty programmes. Send out the voice call with a personal invitation to an event at the store, follow up with an SMS with the details. They work. That's why the stores keep using them. But how much more powerful they are when the SMS is personalised with a relevant offer and when it is sent at the right time. So much so, that the stores that have used it, are now no longer sending out those expensive letter drops.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Social Networks: One Size Fits All?

An old Post by Caterina Fake nee Flickr Very interesting distinction between social networks in terms of how they accommodate different "friendship cultivation" styles (drawn from a Microsoft UK Study) Friendship Cultivators -- friends mean a lot to them and they spend a significant amount of their time nurturing friendships. They're always arranging get togethers and are in constant touch with friends online and on the phone Friendship Pruners -- make and drop friends quickly according to how useful they are. Friendship Pruners name drop a lot -- they like to be seen to be in social contact with the 'in crowd'. They hate 'dead wood' so frequently prune names from their diaries, online buddy lists and mobile phones Friendship Harvesters -- tend to have a very wide circle of friends that they get in touch with on a seasonal basis. They're happy to leave long periods without contact and typically dedicate a set period of time every few weeks or months to a flurry of contact to keep up to date with friends' news and gossip Friendship Gatherers -- are quick to make friends but the least proactive at maintaining friendships. They gather friends wherever they go but are socially lazy and once friendship has been established they rely on the other party to keep it going. They often seek out Friendship Cultivators so they can ride on the back of their frequent social contact and arrangements. Then, a commentator on her blog Don Ramsey says "I find that fascinating, but I'm particularly interested in how different web sites encourage different *kinds* of friendships. e.g. Facebook encourages you to keep in contact with people you already know, MySpace encourages you to add as many 'friends' as possible regardless of if you know (or want to know) them or not. Flickr is somewhere in the middle and encourages sharing with friends while making 'acquaintances' with similar interests. I don't think most sites even consider the kinds of relationships people form when using them - it's usually just a matter of "we need an 'add friend' function". In the end, there's a limit to the number of real friendships you can maintain before people start getting pi**ed off because you don't have time for them" Often the most powerful contacts in your network are those that have "break-out potential", those that span other networks. Given that some of your friends and business contacts will fall into the categories above, perhaps social networking, and how we manage and use them, requires different approaches. Just because someone bought a product from you three years ago does not mean that they want to get an sms update from you. But if you could push the message through a social network, perhaps the message will reach them in a way that is acceptable to them. Just a thought.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Friday, May 25, 2007

Enable Live Conversation For Good Service Delivery

CRMChump Reports An Accenture Customer Service for Technology Companies Study: ● 81 percent of customers surveyed who rated their service satisfaction as “below average” said they will purchase from a different supplier the next time. ● Although 75 percent of executives said their companies’ provide “above average” customer care, 58 percent of consumers rated their satisfaction with customer service as average or below average. ● When consumers rate their service satisfaction as merely “average,” the likelihood of their buying again from that same company falls by almost half from 51 percent to 27 percent. ● 48 percent of consumers surveyed said they share their negative customer-service experiences with friends and family. ● 42 percent of customers surveyed said they had to access customer-service channels multiple times to resolve their problems. ● 61 percent of consumers surveyed said they believe that technology has not improved customer service. ● And as for that 78 percent mentioned above, here it is: That 78 percent surveyed said the service they receive is “at or below” the level competitors offer. When you look at what customers actually want, its straight forward: 69% completeness in solving my problem 65% solving my problem 46% solving my problem with one agent 38% using a logical process to solve my problem 35% enable me to quickly and easily reach a live customer service agent 12 ability to solve the problem myself with online tools. So, (1) Solve my problem, completely, at a single touch-point (2) Engage with me and my problem with logical and efficient process (3) Enable me to speak with customer service very easily. By placing strategic "Click to Call" buttons around your FAQ's or on your "Contact Us" areas, or by dynamically publishing "Click to Call" capability when your website sees that someone is in trouble (taking too long to get through the check out process during a purchase), you can increase the ease with which customers can engage with you. Of course, when they do engage with you, you still have to provide outstanding customer service by knowing how to close out that call first time, with that agent. Having done that, you can begin to think about your upselling and cross selling capability.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

SMS & Voice = Attention-Message-Flow (? !!)

As someone who works in this space, I try to be an early adopter. I am, as my other half puts it, an "infomaniac". The downside of that is that I can experience the information overload, noise, ambient information that can be typified by using a service like Twitter. Alec Saunders brings us a report by Mike Gotta that takes this experience and shows us how it must evolve. The Caveat I will add, is that this is for the "infomaniacs" out there: * Take what's going on in my life * add more context about what I am doing * in the context of my interaction patterns * correlate everything in an intelligent manner * continue to analyze continuously, both past and present * discover what's important to me, even if i may not know it * augment that information before you communicate it to me * signal such information or messages relevant to my work context and focus * in a manner that is aware of my attention priorities I could not agree more. Pieter de Villiers commenting on the last post made the point that the message has to be value adding and that there were lots of instances where people would value "getting interrupted" by an SMS or Phone Call. Like the recent campus killings in the US. If we begin to think of such occurrences in terms of 2.0 thinking, we may be able to think about "message streams from the edge" as opposed to "why don't the authorities phone us".

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Thursday, May 24, 2007

60% of Americans Do Not Want To Get A Text From Your Company, Why?

DestinationCRM carries a report on SMS alerting in the USA. The report, "SMS Customer Service Alerts: The Next Frontier for Mobile Marketing," from Jupiter Research makes some pretty useful points about the context of the alert. Over 60% of the people they interviewed, felt annoyed by SMS alerts.
Consumers are most interested in receiving customer service alerts notifying them when bills are due or when their bank balances have hit a certain level (26 percent) and appointment reminders (24 percent). "These SMS cues let the consumer know where he stands with finances or important personal appointments, and can trigger some form of action--a perfect place for marketers to insert a message like, 'New low rates available on auto loans. Click here,' or, 'Your next haircut qualifies for a 50 percent discount,'" the report states. SMS messages regarding the weather (17 percent) and safety alerts for the consumer's location (another 17 percent) tied for the third most welcome form of notifications, trailed by activity alerts (12 percent), order status (11 percent), and personalized travel alerts (11 percent). Fifty-nine percent, however, noted that they are not interested in alerts. (These findings are based on an April 2007 Jupiter/Ipsos-Insight consumer survey of 1,815 cell phone owners in the U.S.)
You HAVE to let customers Opt-In for such services, and give them as much control as you can as to the who where and when they get such alerts. At VoiceSage, we know this, and that's why our new products in development address these issues. If you look at the examples or where customers want the message, its where the message has genuine two way value. If alerting helps the customer interact more effectively with your organisation, then they will value it.

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , ,

Get your twitter mosaic here.